lodigame 4com

Former Boise State coach Chris Petersen still gets asked about the Fiesta Bowl victory over Oklahoma on the first day of 2007. That game had everything. Underdog Boise State took a 28-10 lead over one of college football's blue bloods that was followed by a 25-point Sooners run capped by what could have been a back-breaking interception return for a touchdown with 1:02 left. Then the Broncos used three trick plays that remain sensations to not only force overtime but win 43-42. And then there was the marriage proposal by Boise State running back Ian Johnson — shortly after scoring the winning two-point play — to cheerleader Chrissy Popadics that was accepted on national TV. That game put Broncos football on the national map for most fans, but looking back 18 years later, Petersen sees it differently. “Everybody wants to talk about that Oklahoma Fiesta Bowl game, which is great how it all worked out and all those things,” Petersen said. “But we go back to play TCU (three years later) again on the big stage. It's not as flashy a game, but to me, that was an even better win.” Going back to the Fiesta Bowl and winning, Petersen reasoned, showed the Broncos weren't a splash soon to fade away, that there was something longer lasting and more substantive happening on the famed blue turf. The winning has continued with few interruptions. No. 8 and third-seeded Boise State is preparing for another trip to the Fiesta Bowl, this time in a playoff quarterfinal against No. 5 and sixth-seeded Penn State on New Year's Eve. That success has continued through a series of coaches, though with a lot more of a common thread than readily apparent. Dirk Koetter was hired from Oregon, where Petersen was the wide receivers coach. Not only did Koetter bring Petersen with him to Oregon, Petersen introduced him to Dan Hawkins, who also was hired for the staff. So the transition from Koetter to Hawkins to Petersen ensured at least some level of consistency. Koetter and Hawkins engineered double-digit victory seasons five times over a six-year span that led to power-conference jobs. Koetter went to Arizona State after three seasons and Hawkins to Colorado after five. Then when Petersen became the coach after the 2005 season, he led Boise State to double-digit wins his first seven seasons and made bowls all eight years. He resisted the temptation to leave for a power-conference program until Washington lured him away toward the end of the 2013 season. Then former Boise State quarterback and offensive coordinator Bryan Harsin took over and posted five double-digit victory seasons over his first six years. After going 5-2 during the COVID-shortened 2020 season, he left for Auburn. “They just needed consistency of leadership,” said Koetter, who is back as Boise State's offensive coordinator. “This program had always won at the junior-college level, the Division II level, the I-AA (now FCS) level.” But Koetter referred to “an unfortunate chain of events” that made Boise State a reclamation project when he took over in 1998. Coach Pokey Allen led Boise State to the Division I-AA national championship game in 1994, but was diagnosed with cancer two days later. He died on Dec. 30, 1996, at 53. Allen coached the final two games that season, Boise State's first in Division I-A (now FBS). Houston Nutt became the coach in 1997, went 4-7 and headed to Arkansas. Then Koetter took over. “One coach dies and the other wasn't the right fit for this program,” Koetter said. “Was a really good coach, did a lot of good things, but just wasn't a good fit for here.” But because of Boise State's success at the lower levels, Koetter said the program was set up for success. “As Boise State has risen up the conference food chain, they’ve pretty much always been at the top from a player talent standpoint,” Koetter said. “So it was fairly clear if we got things headed in the right direction and did a good job recruiting, we would be able to win within our conference for sure.” Success didn't take long. He went 6-5 in 1998 and then won 10 games each of the following two seasons. Hawkins built on that winning and Petersen took it to another level. But there is one season, really one game, no really one half that still bugs Petersen. He thought his best team was in 2010, one that entered that late-November game at Nevada ranked No. 3 and had a legitimate chance to play for the national championship. The Colin Kaepernick-led Wolf Pack won 34-31. “I think the best team that I might've been a part of as the head coach was the team that lost one game to Nevada,” Petersen said. "That team, to me, played one poor half of football on offense the entire season. We were winning by a bunch at half (24-7) and we came out and did nothing on offense in the second half and still had a chance to win. “That team would've done some damage.” There aren't any what-ifs with this season's Boise State team. The Broncos are in the field of the first 12-team playoff, representing the Group of Five as its highest-ranked conference champion. That got Boise State a bye into the quarterfinals. Spencer Danielson has restored the championship-level play after taking over as the interim coach late last season during a rare downturn that led to Andy Avalos' dismissal . Danielson received the job full time after leading Boise State to the Mountain West championship . Now the Broncos are 12-1 with their only defeat to top-ranked and No. 1 seed Oregon on a last-second field goal . Running back Ashton Jeanty also was the runner-up to the Heisman Trophy . “Boise State has been built on the backs of years and years of success way before I got here,” Danielson said. "So even this season is not because of me. It’s because the group of young men wanted to leave a legacy, be different. We haven’t been to the Fiesta Bowl in a decade. They said in January, ‘We’re going to get that done.’ They went to work.” As was the case with Danielson, Petersen and Koetter said attracting top talent is the primary reason Boise State has succeeded all these years. Winning, obviously, is the driving force, and with more entry points to the playoffs, the Broncos could make opportunities to keep returning to the postseason a selling point. But there's also something about the blue carpet. Petersen said he didn't get what it was about when he arrived as an assistant coach, and there was some talk about replacing it with more conventional green grass. A poll in the Idaho Statesman was completely against that idea, and Petersen has come to appreciate what that field means to the program. “It's a cumulative period of time where young kids see big-time games when they're in seventh and eighth and ninth and 10th grade and go, ‘Oh, I know that blue turf. I want to go there,’” Petersen said. Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-footballExperts strongly advise against tobacco use in any form to reduce the risk of developing various types of cancer, including lung, mouth, throat, and bladder cancer. Quitting smoking and avoiding exposure to secondhand smoke can significantly lower the risk of cancer and improve overall health. By promoting tobacco cessation programs and raising awareness about the dangers of smoking, we can empower individuals to make informed decisions about their health and well-being.
None
UltraTech Cement Ltd. received a demand order of about Rs 36 crore from the Ujjain tax authority. The order was passed by the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Ujjain, demanding a goods and services tax of Rs 17 crore in taxes, and another Rs 17 crore in interest and penalty, according to an exchange filing. In a second order, it demanded a tax of Rs 99 lakh and Rs 1,04 crore as interest and penalty. In the first order, the authority has alleged that the company had not paid GST on the amount paid as royalty or upfront fees under reverse charge mechanism. However, UltraTech said that it "is reviewing the order and will decide on further course of action". In another filing on Tuesday, the Aditya Birla group company intimated that it has received another order in original passed confirming partial demand proposed in SCN by the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Ujjain. The second order alleged non-payment of GST on rural infrastructure and road development tax as the reason. For this order too, the company has said that it "is reviewing the order and will decide on further course of action". Recently, the Competition Commission of India had approved UltraTech Cement's proposed acquisition of the India Cements Ltd. for Rs 7,078 crore. In July, the Aditya Birla Group flagship company had announced that it would acquire a 32.72% stake in India Cements from its promoters and their associates for Rs 3,954 crore to expand its footprint in the southern cement market, particularly in Tamil Nadu. Shares of Ultratech Cement Ltd. closed 0.63% lower at Rs 11,395.55 apiece on the BSE, compared to a 0.09% decline in the benchmark Sensex.
The community has rallied together in support of Samantha and her family during this challenging time. Friends, classmates, and concerned citizens have volunteered to distribute flyers, organize search parties, and provide emotional support to the distraught family. The outpouring of solidarity and compassion has been heartwarming, demonstrating the power of unity and community resilience in times of crisis.
None
With its initial public offering (IPO) only happening back in April, cybersecurity company Rubrik ( RBRK 20.44% ) is waisting no time getting the attention of investors. As of 3:30 p.m. ET on Friday, Rubrik stock was up a whopping 25%, hitting an all-time high, after reporting financial results for its fiscal third quarter of 2025. One of the newest cybersecurity stocks Rubrik believes it has a differentiated business in the cybersecurity space . It's trying to secure enterprise data wherever it is -- on the cloud or elsewhere. Whether it's truly unique might be debatable. But one thing that's for sure is that its customers seem to love it. Its Q3 revenue jumped a whopping 43% year over year to $236 million, which was far better than its 35% growth in the previous quarter. Most of Rubrik's revenue is on a subscription basis. And those annualized numbers look good as well. Its annual recurring revenue (ARR) surpassed $1 billion in Q3, which is why management raised its full-year guidance. Previously, it believed its ARR would be $1,026 million to $1,032 million by the end of the fiscal year. Now it believes it will be $1,057 million to $1,061 million. Wells Fargo analyst Andrew Nowinski raised his price target for Rubrik stock from $40 per share all the way up to $76 per share, according to The Fly. It was one of the largest price-target increases among the analyst community. And Nowinski reportedly said that he's expecting "strong growth and operating leverage" from the company, which is high praise from a prominent analyst. Put Rubrik stock on a watch list, at least Rubrik's operating leverage is something for investors to watch. The company ended its fiscal 2024 with $784 million in subscription ARR and turned in negative free cash flow of almost $25 million. It's ARR is now already over $1 billion, and it expects negative free cash flow of $39 million to $45 million. That's slightly the wrong direction for profits, but the outflow isn't bad for a company that's scaling as fast as Rubrik. Moreover, it has over $600 million in cash and investments on the balance sheet, so there's no need to worry about financial stress for this company for a while. In short, Q3 was definitely a good report for the young company, and it's a company for investors to watch from here.Law enforcement officials quickly identified a suspect based on security footage and eyewitness accounts. The individual is described as a highly intelligent individual with a background in engineering and technology. Investigators uncovered evidence suggesting that the weapon used in the shooting may have been a 3D printed gun, a concerning development that raises questions about the accessibility and regulation of such firearms.
US unemployment rise paves way for Fed rate cut
In his analysis, Zhan Jun argues that while Mbappe is undoubtedly a talented player with incredible speed and skill, Salah's recent performances and consistency make him a more suitable choice for the right winger position in the FIFPRO Best XI. Salah has been a standout performer for Liverpool and has consistently delivered exceptional results for both club and country.In the case of the Russian supermarket, it is possible that while the primary source of its products is indeed Russia, certain items may contain components or materials that have been produced in China. This does not necessarily diminish the quality or authenticity of the products, as long as the store maintains transparency and accurately communicates the origins of its inventory to customers.
Consumers today are increasingly concerned about the authenticity and origin of the products they purchase. In the case of a Russian supermarket store that claims to offer authentic guarantee and direct supply from the source, one may wonder: Are the products truly of pure import from Russia, or are they actually manufactured in China?Sydney, Dec. 5: It is an ambitious social experiment of our moment in history — one that experts say could accomplish something that parents, schools and other governments have attempted with varying degrees of success: keeping kids off social media until they turn 16. Australia's new law, approved by its Parliament last week, is an attempt to swim against many tides of modern life — formidable forces like technology, marketing, globalization and, of course, the iron will of a teenager. And like efforts of the past to protect kids from things that parents believe they're not ready for, the nation's move is both ambitious and not exactly simple, particularly in a world where young people are often shaped, defined and judged by the online company they keep. The ban won't go into effect for another year. But how will Australia be able to enforce it? That's not clear, nor will it be easy. TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram have become so ingrained in young people's lives that going cold turkey will be difficult. Other questions loom. Does the ban limit kids' free expression and — especially for those in vulnerable groups — isolate them and curtail their opportunity to connect with members of their community? And how will social sites verify people's ages, anyway? Can't kids just get around such technicalities, as they so often do? This is, after all, the 21st century — an era when social media is the primary communications tool for most of those born in the past 25 years who, in a fragmented world, seek the common cultures of trends, music and memes. What happens when big swaths of that fall away? Is Australia's initiative a good, long-time-coming development that will protect the vulnerable, or could it become a well-meaning experiment with unintended consequences? Platforms will be held liable The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts. "It's clear that social media companies have to be held accountable, which is what Australia is trying to do," said Jim Steyer, president and CEO of the nonprofit Common Sense Media. Leaders and parents in countries around the world are watching Australia's policy closely as many seek to protect young kids from the internet's dangerous corners — and, not incidentally, from each other. Most nations have taken different routes, from parental consent requirements to minimum age limits. Many child safety experts, parents and even teens who have waited to get on social media consider Australia's move a positive step. They say there's ample reason to ensure that children wait. "What's most important for kids, just like adults, is real human connection. Less time alone on the screen means more time to connect, not less," said Julie Scelfo, the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction, or MAMA, a grassroots group of parents aimed at combatting the harms of social media to children. "I'm confident we can support our kids in interacting in any number of ways aside from sharing the latest meme." The harms to children from social media have been well documented in the two decades since Facebook's launch ushered in a new era in how the world communicates. Kids who spend more time on social media, especially when they are tweens or young teenagers, are more likely to experience depression and anxiety, according to multiple studies — though it is not yet clear if there is a causal relationship. What's more, many are exposed to content that is not appropriate for their age, including pornography and violence, as well as social pressures about body image and makeup. They also face bullying, sexual harassment and unwanted advances from their peers as well as adult strangers. Because their brains are not fully developed, teenagers, especially younger ones the law is focused on, are also more affected by social comparisons than adults, so even happy posts from friends can send them into a negative spiral. What unintended harms could be caused? Many major initiatives, particularly those aimed at social engineering, can produce side effects — often unintended. Could that happen here? What, if anything, do kids stand to lose by separating kids and the networks in which they participate? Paul Taske, associate director of litigation at the tech lobbying group NetChoice, says he considers the ban "one of the most extreme violations of free speech on the world stage today" even as he expressed relief that the First Amendment prevents such law in the United States "These restrictions would create a massive cultural shift," Taske said. "Not only is the Australian government preventing young people from engaging with issues they're passionate about, but they're also doing so even if their parents are ok with them using digital services," he said. "Parents know their children and their needs the best, and they should be making these decisions for their families — not big government. That kind of forcible control over families inevitably will have downstream cultural impacts." David Inserra, a fellow for Free Expression and Technology, Cato Institute, called the bill "about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike" in a recent blog post. While Australia's law doesn't require "hard verification" such as an uploaded ID, he said, it calls for effective "age-assurance" that includes an array of ways companies can estimate someone's age. He said no verification system can ensure accuracy while also protecting privacy and not impacting adults in the process. Privacy advocates have also raised concerns about the law's effect on online anonymity, a cornerstone of online communications — and something that can protect teens on social platforms. "Whether it be religious minorities and dissidents, LGBTQ youth, those in abusive situations, whistleblowers, or countless other speakers in tricky situations, anonymous speech is a critical tool to safely challenge authority and express controversial opinions," Inserra said. "But if every user of online platforms must first identify themselves, then their anonymity is at risk." Parents in Britain and across Europe earlier this year organized on platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram to promise not to buy smartphones for children younger than 12 or 13. This approach costs almost no money and requires no government enforcement. In the United States, some parents are keeping kids off social media either informally or as part of an organized campaign such as Wait Until 8th, a group that helps parents delay kids' access to social media and phones. This fall, Norway announced plans to ban kids under 15 from using social media, while France is testing a smartphone ban for kids under 15 in a limited number of schools — a policy that could be rolled out nationwide if successful. U.S. lawmakers have held multiple congressional hearings — most recently in January — on child online safety. Still, the last federal law aimed at protecting children online was enacted in 1998, six years before Facebook's founding. In July, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed legislation designed to protect children from dangerous online content, pushing forward with what would be the first major effort by Congress in decades to hold tech companies more accountable. But the Kids Online Safety Act has since stalled in the House. While several states have passed laws requiring age verification, those are stuck in court. Utah became the first state to pass laws regulating children's social media use in 2023. In September, a judge issued the preliminary injunction against the law, which would have required social media companies to verify the ages of users, apply privacy settings and limit some features. NetChoice has also obtained injunctions temporarily halting similar laws in several other states. And last May, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said there is insufficient evidence to show social media is safe for kids. He urged policymakers to address the harms of social media the same way they regulate things like car seats, baby formula, medication and other products children use. (AP)Scottie Scheffler has new putting grip and trails Cameron Young by 3 in Bahamas
Previous: lodigame 4.com login
Next: lodigame 5 apk